|
What HermanCheckStart
Measures The
HermanCheckStart AssessmentSM measures six work-related interpersonal competencies
or personality traits. These competencies are : Extroversion
- This is a well established scale that at a high level reflects characteristics
which include, being gregarious, outgoing behavior, being engaging, a propensity
toward risk, the desire to talk rather than listen, and preferring to interact
with others rather than be alone. At a low level, the scale indicates characteristics
which include preferring to be and work alone, not engaging others, avoidance
of risk, and being reserved. Rules
- Rules is a construct that was established to measure people's tendencies to
observe and comply with rules, regulations, and established policies and procedures.
The hypothesis that this construct follows is that persons who are high in rules-oriented
behavior exhibit a conventional manner. They tend to be amenable to following
established policies and procedures, and generally prefer a well ordered environment.
Those individuals who are low in rules-oriented behavior exhibit traits which
reflect innovation, a tendency to look for shortcuts in procedures, an ability
to work with few guidelines, and a preference for minimal structure in the environment.
Assertiveness - Assertiveness is a well established psychological
construct. It measures behavior at the high end of the scale, of those who are
forthright, willing to speak their mind, face conflict and controversy, and take
charge, among other things. The converse of these behaviors are reflected at the
low end of the scale and include a submissive nature, a preference for following
as opposed to leading, a tendency to avoid conflict, and a reluctance to state
one's opinions directly. Team
- The team construct is a hypothesis that suggests that the high end of the scale,
describes those persons who are primarily cooperative, put the needs of others
before their own, value harmony, tend to be more fulfilled by engaging in consensus
related activities, and consequently would be more team-oriented. The people described
by the low end of the scale would tend to be extremely competitive, particularly
on an individual basis. Such persons generally put their own needs first; prefer
individual recognition; and often view their team members as either their audience
or as competitors. Organization
- Another well recognized psychological construct, this measures on the high end,
people who are planful, precise, orderly, punctual, and comfortable with details.
On the low end, the Organization scale measures people who tend to be spontaneous,
preferring little or no planning. They have a relaxed view of time, and tend to
focus on the big picture rather than the details. Sensitivity
- This construct measures the traits which reflect immaturity, worry, anxiety,
and tendencies to have generally inconsistent and negative moods. Sensitivity
measured on the high end of this scale represents people whose emotions are subject
to frequent external influences. The low end of this scale measures behavior that
is characterized by stable moods, freedom from worry, lack of anxiety and apprehensiveness,
and a generally positive outlook. Social
Desirability - The social desirability scale came into wide spread use in
the late 1950's. At that time psychologists using 1st Generation assessment instruments
were finding that candidates could manipulate their answers by analyzing the intent
of questions. Candidates would readily choose those adjectives or phrases which
they felt presented favorable descriptions of themselves. This caused a great
deal of concern about the accuracy and the validity of those instruments. To protect
the validity and accuracy, social desirability scales were developed. These have
been variously known as "faking good/faking bad", "impression management",
and measures of distortion. They are all basically checks which ensure that a
person's report is reliable. It allows the users of the HermanCheckStart Assessmentª
system to be confident that the report that they are reading reflects a true picture
of the candidate. General
Reasoning - This measure of cognitive ability is a construct of several primary
factors of intelligence, including verbal reasoning, numerical reasoning, and
spatial reasoning. This composite provides a broad assessment of the fluid intelligence
or basic reasoning ability of an individual. This reflects the efficiency with
which they deal with information. It is the basis for job-related abilities such
as speed of learning, problem solving ability, logical thinking, and the ability
to express ideas. | |